Customer lifetime value is the number that leads your investor deck and the number your commercial system is least well-designed to actually produce. I want to say that clearly because the gap between LTV as a projection and LTV as a designed outcome is one of the most consistently expensive gaps I see in fintech businesses at growth stage.
Projecting LTV tells you what the business is worth if customers behave in a certain way. Designing for LTV means building the commercial architecture, the onboarding sequence, the product experience, the re-engagement logic, the cross-sell timing, in a way that makes that behaviour probable rather than hoped for.
In a fintech where LTV was a number in the model before it was an objective in the operating plan, the commercial system was built to acquire and it shows. The acquisition machine is excellent. The compounding machine was never built. And the difference between those two things is becoming visible in the numbers the investor deck is now having to explain.
Related reading