I want to say something about political air cover that usually goes unsaid because saying it requires admitting that the need for it exists.
A CMO who can see the real constraint on commercial performance but cannot name it internally without the professional consequences landing on them personally is in a position that external senior support is specifically designed to resolve. Not because the CMO is wrong. Because the CMO is right, and being right about a structural problem from inside the structure that created it is not enough to act on it without external validation that makes the conversation safe to have.
An external read that confirms what you already know changes the political conditions for the conversation. It shifts the source of the finding from inside the organisation, where it can be managed or dismissed, to outside it, where it carries a different kind of weight. The CEO who would not act on the CMO's read of the problem will act on the same read when it comes with thirty years of external operating experience behind it and a structured assessment methodology underneath it.
That is not a workaround. That is how change that touches structural decisions actually gets made.
Related reading